1 Million More Americans Might Have Their Food Benefits Revoked

February 4, 2016
by Steve Holt for Thrive Market
1 Million More Americans Might Have Their Food Benefits Revoked

For tens of millions of low-income Americans, a monthly Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefit—formerly known as food stamps—is a lifeline.

SNAP recipients use the benefit to buy food. The average $150 to $170 per person monthly stipend is not enough for most families to fill their pantries and refrigerators—but it's a start.

Come April, that lifeline could be yanked back for up to a million SNAP recipients across the nation when many states reinstate a three-month limit on the benefit for single adults between ages 18 and 49 who are not “diligently looking for work.” Twenty-three states are choosing to reinstate the work requirement, which was originally made law in the 1996 Welfare Reform legislation but relaxed by President Obama during the Great Recession. This will affect between 500,000 and 1 million SNAP recipients, who have three months (starting January 1) to find work or have their benefit taken away.

“This work requirement is particularly harsh,” wrote Chad Stone, a chief economist at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, in a column for US News & World Report. “Unemployed individuals will be cut off the SNAP rolls after three months no matter how hard they're looking for work and even if their state runs few or no employment programs and doesn't offer them a spot in a work or training program—which is the case in most states. Those working less than 20 hours a week are also out of luck.”

Stone goes on to write the “the affected people are among the nation's poorest,” earning an average of just 17 percent of the poverty line—that's only $2,000 per year for someone living alone.

Critics of the SNAP program say many of its recipients defraud the system by taking the benefit and refusing to find a job, but the data refutes such claims. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the majority of SNAP recipients who can work, do. And overall, the CBPP reports that fraudulent claims make up less than 3 percent of all recipients, as SNAP has one of the most rigorous quality-control systems of any public benefit program.

What’s more, Stone points out that $170 a month for food—or about $5 a day—is scarcely enough of an incentive for a person to stay unemployed.

The work requirement policy also may drop many recipients it shouldn’t. Like the 27-year-old deaf son of Tennessee nonprofit director Terry Work. Despite the fact that his condition makes it difficult to find or keep a job, Work’s son—who was recently denied disability payments—received a letter saying he would lose his benefits on April 1.

“Nobody will hire him,” Work told the Chattanooga Times Free Press. “They're not supposed to discriminate, but they find ways around it.”

The decrease in SNAP recipients is expected to put a burden on the nation’s food banks and pantries.

Editor's Note: The article originally stated that Work's son was blind, not deaf.

Photo credit: I-5 Design and Manufacture via Flickr

Print Article

This article is related to: Food, News, Educational

Share This Article

#HungryForLove? Your Best Food Pun Could Win You $500 in Thrive Cash!

10 thoughts on “1 Million More Americans Might Have Their Food Benefits Revoked”

  • Deanna Clark

    Looks like it's time for Christians to step up more...and Jews, Moslems, and the whole present cast of Citizens. Perhaps our taxes will go down ...hee! hee!

    • Monica

      I'm a Christian volunteering at our church food pantry. Do you have any ideas what else I could do?

      • Deanna Clark

        Golly, Monica...so sweet! My advice (as one who has been too compulsive a giver at times), is also put your own money into wholesome food...supporting brands of organic soups and cereals instead of fast foods, which will put you in the hospital eventually.
        I am a senior and caregiver, also with grandchildren and animals here...and know cheap food is a bad way to go....so pass that on to others with a prayer.

        Many of us old timers don't like the quality food movement to be about swank and hypochondria. That was always it's original sin. I would love it to become ordinary food for everybody....which is why I'm here at this site...to feed my family decent food on a budget.
        The Newman's Own foods give profits to honest, simple charities like food banks and summer camps for handicapped children, etc. So that makes the most of any charity $$ left in the budget. They replaced the freezers at our local Food Bank.

        I want to choose healthy stuff...and also not lose the common touch. All around are people who just want to share a cup of coffee and a little kindness. Some of my generation got snotty about all this purity. So helping at the food pantry puts you in the middle of it all. Don't you wish there would be more donations of better food? Less cheap creamed corn and more good soup and proteins would build stronger little bodies!! Maybe put out a few cans of good salmon and soups as an inspiration...like the dollars the deli owner puts in the tip jar to suggest good tips!!!

  • Dawn Gaye

    As a disabled person (who would REALLY like Thrive to accept SNAP benefits!) I couldn't help but notice the paragraph at the end of the article referring to the blind 27 year old who was refused disability. Now, that didn't sound right to me at all, so I followed the link to the article at the Chattanooga Free times press. The male mentioned is not blind but deaf. I would advise him and his mother to continue filing for disability. However that makes a lot more sense than telling us a BLIND man was denied!!

  • dan vitale

    Able-bodied single males between the ages of 18 and 49 might lose their food stamp benefit? Oh dear how awful!!!!!

  • Gale Lett

    It's about time they started coming down on these leeches on society. Able bodied people should be working or looking for work. Not sitting around collecting food stamps and cash benefits. Those benefits should be for those who can't work, the disabled. It should be a hand up, not a hand out. I support this 100%.

    • Lily

      FYI you can't get cash benefits unless you are part of a work training program or have an actual job. You have to have 35 hours minimum of a work activity per week. So technically it's not a hand out honey.

  • Bugby Samsung

    Unfortunately your "sources" are from one source: The Center on Budget and and Policy Priorities, an "American think tank that analyzes the impact of federal and state government budget policies from a progressive viewpoint." Their facts are skewed to a specific viewpoint. In order to present an unbiased article, there should be a number of sources from various points of view.

Leave a Reply